Refactor how we differentiate bootable containers variants from classic ostree ones using conditional includes.
See: https://coreos.github.io/rpm-ostree/treefile/
Build succeeded. https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/7c58eda1c7604250b6ed50de5143bed8
LGTM
Would be nice to get eyes from folks using the non SB/Kinoite variants
rebased onto 9e3a473f7385bd87262925e1d72a9cc8a831035f
Thanks. I've manually verified that this is a NOP and that we get the same manifests before and after this commit.
Build failed. More information on how to proceed and troubleshoot errors available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/cb34d66b6c4b43feae3b41447ddbf821
recheck
Build succeeded. https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/fc3921e8760e4e1195bb139ef15b5046
Pull-Request has been merged by siosm
Latest quay.io/fedora/fedora-silverblue:41 images don't include bootc
https://quay.io/repository/fedora/fedora-silverblue/manifest/sha256:82225e05d4795ce8674b8fc1f652c7a7e5e77567bff79b6203d705ce1d04b57c?tab=packages
Details in https://gitlab.com/fedora/ostree/sig/-/issues/48
Refactor how we differentiate bootable containers variants from classic
ostree ones using conditional includes.
See: https://coreos.github.io/rpm-ostree/treefile/