So, when you add a repo that has both x86_64 and x86 packages and you expect to do an x86 compose:
Hardware: x86_64 Compose Target: x86 Repos: Fedora 7 x86, Fedora 7 Updates x86, Random x86_64 and x86 repo
"Search" package selection returns x86 package... so I selected it.
Actual transaction downloaded the x86_64 package.
Adding exclude=.x86_64 to the x86 revisor config fixed the issue. Maybe we should do this a more graceful way? Do we just ship configs for x86 with exclude=.x86_64 and x86_64 configs with exclude=*.i?86 ... ?
This is invalid. Repositories for x86 composes shouldn't have x86_64 packages. x86_64 repositories however may have x86 packages for multilib, but not vice-versa. Same reason why we do not have one giant repository with all archs in it.
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6
Add this to a f7 i386 live spin on x86_64 Fedora.
Should we really keep this from releasing our final 2.0.3.x release? We can look into it but doesn't this also depend on the x86/x86_64 issues like the ones with the kernel that we have?
Please move this one back to 2.0.4 milestone if you agree.
Issue does not exist in the latest version of Revisor
Metadata Update from @jsteffan: - Issue set to the milestone: 2.1.0 Release