packaging-committee

#890 Stop using %systemd_requires for packages which only install unit files
Merged by james. Opened by zbyszek.
zbyszek/packaging-committee remove-systemd-requires  into  master

Download 890.patch
no initial comment

I would appreciate if you could convert to semantic breaks (sembr.com)

sembr.com

May be available
Complete this form to get a price quote on
sembr.com:

?

(OK, I know what you mean. Dunno, I can do the conversion, if people insist, but I don't think it matters too much for new text. I wouldn't change existing text with crazy long lines, but I'm not too happy to add new.)

Sorry, I meant sembr.org :)

I would prefer to have any new text written in sembr way so that we don't have to convert it later.

3 new commits added

  • Stop using %systemd_requires for packages which only install unit files
  • Fix some obsolete paths
  • Fix links to systemd man pages

Updated to have less breaks.

As I have outlined in the mailing list, I think we should change to default to %{?systemd_ordering} and only suggest using %{?systemd_requires} in cases where it's actually needed.

What is the motivation to use %{?systemd_ordering} (over simply nothing)?

Metadata Update from @churchyard:
- Pull-request tagged with: meeting

We talked about this at this weeks meeting (https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-05-16/fpc.2019-05-16-16.00.txt):

  • PR#890 Stop using %systemd_requires for packages which only install
    unit files (geppetto, 16:10:25)
  • LINK: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/890
    (geppetto, 16:10:41)
  • ACTION: PR#890 Stop using %systemd_requires for packages which only
    install unit files (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto, 16:23:52)

Pull-Request has been merged by james
Metadata
None

meeting

Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.