No objection from me, though install from /dev/null is perhaps a bit abstruse for the entirety of the audience. Why isn't touch sufficient? If it's about the permissions, touch and then chmod would probably be less confusing to someone who isn't trying to avoid using two commands for some reason.

(This makes me think once again that it would be nice if we were guaranteed a specific default umask in rpm scriptlets.)

We discussed this at this weeks meeting (http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-02-23/fpc.2017-02-23-17.00.txt):

• 680 tmpfiles.d minor cleanup (geppetto, 17:10:49)
• LINK:
  https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ATmpfiles.d&diff=current&oldid=458504
  (orionp, 17:17:57)
• ACTION: tmpfiles.d minor cleanup (+1:6, 0:1, -1:0) (geppetto,
  17:21:54)

There's actually nothing to write up here; we did it all during the meeting.

Announcement text:

The example spec in the tmpfiles.d guidelines has been cleaned up.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tmpfiles.d
* https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/680
* https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/670