This is a change to the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines it was originally posted to the Talk page there and I'm reposting it here for discussion and voting
The two "Upgrade path example" listings (for mozilla and alsa-lib) in the Release Tag section strike me as confusing. In every other list of NVRs given as an example, the text in parentheses that follows each entry is a description of that NVR. For the two upgrade path examples, even though they're formatted in exactly the same way, the text in parentheses effectively describes the NVR on the ''following'' line.
Well, after 5 months without comment on this, I decided to take a page from Wikipedia and "be bold". So, I undertook a re-working of the descriptions in the two Upgrade Path examples I mentioned. In the process, I ended up eliminating the giant <PRE>s and wikifying the whole works. (All because I wanted to use links in the descriptions! LOL.)
There shouldn't be any content changes (other than the explanation texts in the two Upgrade Path examples), just lots of formatting tweaks. I'm still not happy about how the table captions look -- I'd prefer they be left-justified rather than centered, I think. Other than that, it seems pretty serviceable to me... but I'm biased. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ferdnyc/PackagingEditTest, submitted for your consideration. ;-)
--[[User:Ferdnyc|Ferdnyc]] 09:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Announce Text:
The Pre-Release packages section was improved significantly, with the intent of making it more clear through the use of specific examples in tables.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
Metadata Update from @spot: - Issue assigned to spot