A Fedora Review ticket was approved and requires a sponsor.
RHBZ: 2314746 Package: gdu - Fast disk usage analyzer with console interface written in Go Contributor: Alexey Lunev (FAS @xbt573) Reviewer: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
This ticket was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
Hello @xbt573, please let us know if you already found a sponsor somewhere else. In such case we can assign the correct person to this ticket and not interfere with their process.
Feel free take this opportunity to also say a few words about yourself. It is not mandatory so you don't have to, but it will help us form a human connection.
Hi! I'm primarily a Golang developer, I plan to work with the following: gdu, navidrome, openmw and maybe other packages in the future.
I don't have a comment about the request, but I do have one about the naming of the program. On Macs (macports etc) it's common to name the GNU versions of standard tools as g<name>, eg. gdu is the GNU version of du. configure scripts and similar (running on Fedora) will get confused here.
g<name>
gdu
du
rjones@mini:~$ uname -a Darwin mini.home.annexia.org 24.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 24.0.0: Tue Sep 24 23:36:26 PDT 2024; root:xnu-11215.1.12~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T8103 arm64 rjones@mini:~$ gdu --version du (GNU coreutils) 9.5 Copyright (C) 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <https://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>. This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Written by Torbjörn Granlund, David MacKenzie, Paul Eggert, and Jim Meyering.
I'm not sure if this is in any way related to Fedora. gdu is installed as gdu-go in homebrew.
gdu-go
The issue is what it's called on Fedora. It would interact badly with configure lines like this: https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/blob/f80723fc76724e94bdf0e41a13b1c9280304d957/configure.ac#L739 Not that this is impossibly difficult to fix or anything, just saying it's a thing.
I've sponsored @xbt573 into the packager group.
@rjones I understand your concern, but I think there should be another forum, either bugzilla for downstream or https://github.com/dundee/gdu/issues for upstream, to discuss about the package naming.
Unless naming of the package is a blocker here, the ticket can be closed.
Metadata Update from @kevin: - Issue close_status updated to: accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)