I'm requesting sponsor status. I'm the maintainer of ursa-major [1] in Fedora, and recently my colleague @julian8628 (Yuming Zhu) is going to take the ownership of ursa-major in Fedora and needs a sponsor, he is also a koji developer for years. I am willing to be his sponsor and co-maintain ursa-major in the future.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ursa-major
I am not sure why you need to become a sponsor for this. Can you please elaborate?
Hi @ignatenkobrain, because @julian8628 is currently not in "packager" group, he can't push and merge changes and I can't assign him as the package owner of "ursa-major".
Well, for that you don't need to be a sponsor, he needs to find a sponsor and that person can add him to a packager's group.
I have sponsored @julian8628 to the packager's group now.
I guess nothing else needs to be done here, if not - please reopen.
Metadata Update from @ignatenkobrain: - Issue close_status updated to: declined - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Or could you add @julian8628 to packager group? That also works for us, if a sponsor is required, we can try to find a sponsor.
Metadata Update from @qwan: - Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)
@qwan You still can apply to become sponsor. But for that you have to have different reasoning and understand other sponsors responsibilites. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor#Becoming_a_Fedora_Package_Collection_Sponsor
closing, it's resolved but I commented before checking the latest status.
Metadata Update from @qwan: - Issue close_status updated to: accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Metadata Update from @kkofler: - Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)
Metadata Update from @kkofler: - Issue close_status updated to: declined - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
The issue was a request for sponsor status, which was not accepted (because you have withdrawn it, and at least I am not convinced that you would have satisfied the criteria to begin with).
Yeah, this should be done without any trouble. But please open a separate ticket for this so we have a normal record of the decision.