+1 on this from me :)

Willb did some reviews on my packages and it seems he is a skilled reviewer. He's patitient and explainative, too. Three things which make a good sponsor.

btw. [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=CLOSED&classification=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&email1=willb%40redhat.com&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=1826149&product=Fedora&product=Fedora%20EPEL&query_format=advanced here] is a working list of the reviews he's done so far.

I'm not sure. 5 owned packages is the minimum. Reviewed packages are either without problem or (and this is problem for me) he allow maintainers to do those necessary changes after approval. Well in case of experienced users like besser82 it is not problem. But I would like to see more guidance from sponsor.

I hesitate, but after all +1 from me.

I don't cast any vote, since this might be history, but sponsor should deal better with objections such as:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711230#c8

I am of the opinion that one should not need to open any attachment to view the review notes. Personally I feel he need to do more reviews.

-1 from me for now.

+1 - Thrift was quite the undertaking.

This request failed to generate enough votes in the 1 week timeframe. ;(

Please resubmit when you feel ready to try again.