Firstly, I will need to package dependencies.

The review request for one dependency (opytimark) is up. I want to ask someone to review it.

LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144033

Please remember to block the fedora-neuro tracker bug, so the review ticket appears on the meeting agenda too. Done it now:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941

@iztokf: should opytimark be added to the neuro-sig packages? If yes, please give neuro-sig commit access to it, and add it to the docs too.

@ankursinha, yes. I am going to add to the packages.

Awesome, thanks very much. :100:

The review request for the main package is now up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150221

Thanks!

Dear neuro-sig team,

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

This package is still un-reviewed. If anyone has some free time, please take up this review task.

@iztokf : please consider offering a review swap on the -devel list. That way we interact with all package maintainers and share resources with them too, instead of limiting our work only to the (small number) of neuro-sig maintainers.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-opytimizer

This ticket has been migrated to the forgejo instance. Please find the new ticket here
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/neuro/NeuroFedora//issues/537