gssproxy.service really only makes sense with the network also running. Adding this additional ordering should help avoid some conditions where gssproxy gets confused without networks.
Triggering gssproxy confusion is a bit complex. However, it does seem clear that, if network.target is enabled, gssproxy.service really should run after it. But if you've got a use case where gssproxy runs without network, this will not impact those folks.
gssproxy.service really only makes sense with the network also running. Adding this additional ordering should help avoid some conditions where gssproxy gets confused without networks.
Triggering gssproxy confusion is a bit complex. However, it does seem clear that, if
network.targetis enabled,gssproxy.servicereally should run after it. But if you've got a use case where gssproxy runs without network, this will not impact those folks.