While I can see your intentions (which are quite similar to Mozilla's take on this), I find it a bit jarring that the footer on the main site does not actually mention the fact that (and I'm presuming based off Legal:Licenses, which is buried in fine print) the site's text content is CC-BY-SA licensed.

I'd recommend changing the copyright notice to something more accurate, either using Wikipedia's "Text available under a Creative Commons license, additional terms may apply" (i.e., link that to Legal:Licenses), or Mozilla's "Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License v3.0 or any later version."

This may have to be run past fedora-legal, but isn't it time to at least ''stop'' burying the truth in fine print?