sounds great. would you be focusing on any particular new feature(s) of the eclipse packager stuff for f16, or just a general test to make sure everything is in shape for the release? would you like to take charge of organizing the event, have qa do it, or meet somewhere in the middle? thanks!

This is a general test to ensure everything is okay for the release, including regression testing and testing of new capabilities (e.g. importing SRPMs). We have plans for hosting it ourselves.

Hi Adam,

We'll be editing our draft test day wiki page here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jerboaa/Test_Day:_Eclipse

This should give you a better idea what we intend to have tested by users should we get a test day slot assigned. Thanks!

we don't really 'assign' slots, you can just go ahead and grab any open slot! it's perfectly fine to edit the f16 test days page and put your event into any of the open slots, go ahead and do that if you like.

Replying to [comment:5 adamwill]:

we don't really 'assign' slots, you can just go ahead and grab any open slot! it's perfectly fine to edit the f16 test days page and put your event into any of the open slots, go ahead and do that if you like.

Ok, thanks. We've chosen the open slot of October 13 and we will be focusing on Fedora Packager for Eclipse 0.2 testing.

On the wiki template it has a place for available QA contacts. There aren't any QA people associated with this plugin. Is this a problem? Do you have a contact person?

it's not a problem: the template assumes there's usually going to be someone from QA involved with the event and they'd be listed there, but if you're going to do all the organizing yourself, you can just list developers who'll be present and cut the QA personnel line out.

The event went off as planned:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-10-13_Fedora_Packager_for_Eclipse

thanks for all your work in organizing it. Apologies for any lack in support from our side, we had a busy F16 cycle.

This issue has been migrated to Fedora Forge:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/quality/tickets/issues/234

Please continue any further discussion there.