Hi, the entire current docs schedule is referencing tools and workflows we haven't been using in years (beats on wiki, publican...) and I think it's best to get rid of it altogether. I threw together something more current; let's try this and adjust for future releases if needed.
Since docs heavily depend on other teams and on their tasks being complete, it's best to tie our milestones to key project milestones. The milestone each task is tied to is shown in the table; I hope it makes sense.
On top of the above, the Final Release Readiness Meeting and Final release Go/No-Go Meeting tasks should apply to us as well. The Beta ones shouldn't since we're not delivering anything for Beta.
The general idea is to aim to be ready a week before GA and to hopefully give translators at least a little bit of time to get started before GA, while still giving docs some time to actually write.
Also, Ben, the Change release notes: submission deadline is basically a task for you, since you're the one opening those issues. If you're not okay with the deadline, adjust it as you need; I picked a date I thought was reasonable but I could be wrong.
Change release notes: submission deadline
@pbokoc this is great, thanks so much for the detail. This all seems to make sense. For the Change release notes: submission deadline, I think I'll just leave that out entirely, since i create the issues as they are approved by FESCo. I'm open to leaving it in if you feel strongly about it.
I also wonder how many non-Change release notes we have. This can be a topic for a separate discussion, but I would think most things that would generate a release note should be filed as a Change.
@bcotton OK, I'm fine with leaving it out.
As for non-Change relnotes, there are a couple every release, usually fewer than 5. One item that appears every release is installer changes, since Anaconda is more or less unique to Fedora so you can't easily find that info elsewhere the same way you can with something like Python. Other than that it's whatever people feel like reporting to us. I'd like that to be a bigger part of the release notes, but changes should definitely come first.
@pbokoc I have a draft F31 schedule that incorporates your feedback. Some of the anchor points aren't quite the way you described because of how the tooling works, but it should work out about the same. Please let me know if you see anything that's wrong.
Metadata Update from @bcotton: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)