This should be IoT$ as above

Not sure this should be the same as image-build, this tells ImageFactory about things like UEFI vs BIOS

We'll also want to move the Installer artefacts over to osbuild

This should be IoT$ as above

Thanks, wasn't too sure but based it on the rhel config. Updated.

Not sure this should be the same as image-build, this tells ImageFactory about things like UEFI vs BIOS

Agreed, I saw your recent PR and thought it wouldn't hurt. The rhel config uses 'rhel-90'

So this won't be a traditional repo, this will a ostree commit of some sort.

So if we look at the docs for RHEL for Edge we'll see some of what's expected from osbuild (see procedure):
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta/html/composing_installing_and_managing_rhel_for_edge_images/composing-a-rhel-for-edge-image-using-image-builder-command-line_composing-installing-managing-rhel-for-edge-images

We'll probably need to provide:
--ref rhel/8/x86_64/edge --url URL-OSTree-repository

I suspect one of the defines will be:
image-type is edge-installer

Updated the PR to use ostree url and ref, the naming is based on the koji api and may need to be adjusted. Updated to reflect the upstream name of raw images 'edge-raw-image', this may also change when the Fedora equivalent is available.

Added the installer portion, the 'fedora-iot-installer' image type hasn't been merged yet so will depend on that happening first.

Does this need to be an array? osbuild-composer accepts just one string here.

ditto

@obudai updated with those changes and the new configuration options: ostree_url,
ostree_url from the pungi commit.

We renamed this to iot-raw-image.

As discussed on Tuesday, this is currently broken due to changed lorax templates.

Removed the installer portion, changed to iot-raw-image.

the indenting needs some fixup by the look, other than that I think we're good to merge this.