We'd like to run non-critical fedora coreos supporting applications in communishift. One example is a web app that validates configuration files to be used with ignition. Not mission critical, but a nice tool for our users to use.
To do this it would be nice if we had group access to a project or a set of projects such that anyone in the group could administer the apps. How can we go about making something like this happen?
regarding a 'set of projects' it would be neat if we could reserve fedora-coreos* named projects to be accessible to the group members only and disallow anyone outside of the group from creating fedora-coreos* projects. I don't know if that's technically possible though.
fedora-coreos*
We don't have a way to do this auotmatically right now.
I can manually make you a project/namespace and manually give users perms to that namespace/project. Would that be usefull now?
Or shall I just let you know when/if we can do this?
Metadata Update from @kevin: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Reporter (was: Needs Review) - Issue tagged with: communishift
We don't have a way to do this auotmatically right now. I can manually make you a project/namespace and manually give users perms to that namespace/project. Would that be usefull now?
Even if we can't automatically do this can we still set up a group that we then manually sync (can run a command to sync them). That way we can manage membership to the group and then it's easy us to ask you to just sync them without naming specific names.
Maybe the above in between solution would work for now?
We don't have a sync script right now. We don't currently have plans or resources to make one.
I'm not talking about an automated solution.. It could literally be a bash script that:
@bowlofeggs can you link me to the docs you are making for adding users to communishift ?
Metadata Update from @cverna: - Issue tagged with: backlog
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 15:57 +0000, Dusty Mabe wrote:
@bowlofeggs can you link me to the docs you are making for adding users to communishift ?=20
They don't exist publicly yet, and may not for a few weeks.
This looks like it needs to have an assignee write a script to do this.
Metadata Update from @smooge: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Assignee (was: Waiting on Reporter)
👍
Should we close this one until we figure out how communishift will come back to life?
Metadata Update from @pingou: - Issue priority set to: Next Meeting (was: Waiting on Assignee)
Due to many outstanding issues in resources, time and other factors (outlined in https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q74QYG54MNBCY7UX2GITPAZYKHD6BYFH/ ) we are unable to move forward with setting up an OpenShift cluster at this time. It is unclear how long in the future it may be until this is possible, so we are closing this ticket. We apologize for this inconvenience.
Metadata Update from @smooge: - Issue close_status updated to: Will Not/Can Not fix - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)