fedora-infrastructure

#12592 Checksum not matching
Closed: Upstream by kevin. Opened by julfium.

Closed: Upstream
Reopen Issue

Describe what you would like us to do:

Check why the hash in the CHECKSUM file doesn't match with the hash of downloaded files under
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/direct-downloads/archive-virtio/virtio-win-0.1.271-1/ (using md5sum virtio-win-0.1.271.iso for example)

When do you need this to be done by? (2025/06/06)

Works for me. Note that the ISO file is not included in the list of checksums, only the *.rpm files.
Also, the unversioned files HTTP redirect to the versioned files, so they are the same file.

$ ls
CHECKSUM  virtio-win-0.1.271-1.noarch.rpm  virtio-win-0.1.271-1.src.rpm
$ cat CHECKSUM
b359277aa48f1ff21a1fc7be50180eb7  virtio-win-0.1.271-1.noarch.rpm
7c261d646e686aa531596e2c0decab0c  virtio-win-0.1.271-1.src.rpm
b359277aa48f1ff21a1fc7be50180eb7  virtio-win.noarch.rpm
7c261d646e686aa531596e2c0decab0c  virtio-win.src.rpm
$ md5sum -c CHECKSUM
virtio-win-0.1.271-1.noarch.rpm: OK
virtio-win-0.1.271-1.src.rpm: OK
md5sum: virtio-win.noarch.rpm: No such file or directory
virtio-win.noarch.rpm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: virtio-win.src.rpm: No such file or directory
virtio-win.src.rpm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: WARNING: 2 listed files could not be read
$

is it intended to only have the checksums for the RPMs?

We have no idea. This content is created and managed by the virt-sig...

See this comment in the releng ticket:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12768#comment-974789

Metadata Update from @kevin:
- Issue close_status updated to: Upstream
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Metadata
None
None
None
None
Lowest
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.