Issue #84: sssd subprocess should probably exit() if the monitor dies - sssd

SSSD / sssd

#84 sssd subprocess should probably exit() if the monitor dies

Closed: Fixed Opened Jul 20, 2009 by simo.

If the monitor segfaults, all the sssd_* process keep going on. They should probably catch the parent has gone away and die even if the monitor didn't give any signal

jhrozek commented Aug 4, 2009

Fields changed

owner: somebody => jhrozek
status: new => assigned

jhrozek commented Aug 12, 2009

Fixed in dd8aaf74198c084fd0aa712d56c4511978f04ebe

component: SSSD => Service Monitor
fixedin: => 0.5.0
resolution: => fixed
status: assigned => closed

jgalipea commented Sep 25, 2009

Fields changed

doc: => 0
docupdated: => 0
tests: => 1
testsupdated: => 0

jgalipea commented Oct 2, 2009

Fields changed

tests: 1 => 0
testsupdated: 0 => 1

dpal commented Jan 19, 2012

Fields changed

rhbz: => 0

Metadata Update from @simo:
- Issue assigned to jhrozek
- Issue set to the milestone: SSSD 1.0

Feb 24, 2017

pbrezina commented May 2, 2020

SSSD is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests
will be accepted only in SSSD's github repository.

This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here:
- https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/1126

If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue
and click on subscribe button.

Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.

Metadata

Assignee

jhrozek

Tags

None

Blocking

None

Depending on

None

Priority

High

type

defect

component

Service Monitor

version

None

testsupdated

rhbz

SSSD / sssd

#84 sssd subprocess should probably exit() if the monitor dies Closed: Fixed Opened Jul 20, 2009 by simo.

Metadata

#84 sssd subprocess should probably exit() if the monitor dies

Closed: Fixed Opened Jul 20, 2009 by simo.