sssd git version 2009-09-24 plus this patch https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2009-September/000686.html
Things seem better now. Previously resuming from suspend and having sssd crash, only sssd main and sssd_dp processes were running.
Now I tried three times suspending. Computer was many hours in suspend. In one of the tests I got sssd crash. There is no core or debug.log :-( but process list available. Only sssd_nss has crashed.
When I resume from suspend gnome-screensaver tries to find credentials for the user that has logged in right away because screen is locked. Maybe it would be worth checking if sssd_nss has similar problem as fixed by the patch in the link.
[root@host ~]# ps -aux|grep sssd Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ root 3358 0.0 0.0 139600 1872 ? Ss 18:01 0:03 /usr/sbin/sssd -D root 3367 0.0 0.1 137480 2556 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_dp -d 0 root 3374 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 18:01 0:00 [sssd_nss] <defunct> root 3375 0.0 0.1 140484 3612 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_pam -d 0 root 3376 0.0 0.2 147616 5652 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be -d 0 --domain LDAP root 6719 0.0 0.0 61176 720 tty1 R+ 19:22 0:00 grep sssd [root@host ~]#
Maybe this process list is better aligned:
Now I got the same result after unhooking the laptop from docking station. As user I do:
[username@host ~]$ ps -aux|grep -i sssd Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ root 3357 0.0 0.0 139620 1840 ? Ss 11:43 0:05 /usr/sbin/sssd -f -D -d 5 root 3366 0.0 0.1 137496 2168 ? S 11:43 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_dp -d 5 --debug-to-files root 3381 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 11:43 0:00 [sssd_nss] <defunct> root 3384 0.0 0.1 135604 2272 ? S 11:43 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_pam -d 5 --debug-to-files root 3385 0.0 0.2 147636 5248 ? S 11:43 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be -d 5 --debug-to-files --domain LDAP root 9213 0.0 0.0 58940 524 pts/2 S+ 14:14 0:00 tail -f /var/log/sssd/sssd.log 811 9332 0.0 0.0 61176 724 pts/4 R+ 14:17 0:00 grep -i sssd [username@host ~]$
..and it takes a long time to complete, maybe couple of minutes. While waiting for the command to complete as root I get instantly:
[root@host ~]# ps -ef|grep -i sssd root 3357 1 0 11:43 ? 00:00:05 /usr/sbin/sssd -f -D -d 5 root 3366 3357 0 11:43 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_dp -d 5 --debug-to-files root 3381 3357 0 11:43 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_nss -d 5 --debug-to-files root 3384 3357 0 11:43 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_pam -d 5 --debug-to-files root 3385 3357 0 11:43 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be -d 5 --debug-to-files --domain LDAP root 9213 9173 0 14:14 pts/2 00:00:00 tail -f /var/log/sssd/sssd.log username 9332 9301 0 14:17 pts/4 00:00:00 grep -i sssd root 9412 9373 0 14:18 pts/5 00:00:00 grep -i sssd
This is with sssd-0.6.0
version: 0.5.0 => 0.6.0
This seems to be a configuration error on the system. I have overlapping id ranges. defining filter_users=root,overlappinguser filter_groups=root,overlappinggroup
seems to fix the issue.
priority: major => minor
I was wrong, defining filterusers etc does not fix the issue.
priority: minor => major
Unplugging the network cable is enough to reproduce the issue.
login with account on native ldap, unplug network cable, wait 20secs or more, do: ps -aux
and you should see the issue
Fields changed
description: sssd git version 2009-09-24 plus this patch https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2009-September/000686.html
[root@host ~]# ps -aux|grep sssd Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ root 3358 0.0 0.0 139600 1872 ? Ss 18:01 0:03 /usr/sbin/sssd -D root 3367 0.0 0.1 137480 2556 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_dp -d 0 root 3374 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 18:01 0:00 [sssd_nss] root 3375 0.0 0.1 140484 3612 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_pam -d 0 root 3376 0.0 0.2 147616 5652 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be -d 0 --domain LDAP root 6719 0.0 0.0 61176 720 tty1 R+ 19:22 0:00 grep sssd [root@host ~]# => sssd git version 2009-09-24 plus this patch https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2009-September/000686.html
When I resume from suspend gnome-screensaver tries to find credentials for the user that has logged in right away because screen is locked. Maybe it would be worth checking if sssd_nss has similar problem as fixed by the patch in the link. {{{ [root@host ~]# ps -aux|grep sssd Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ root 3358 0.0 0.0 139600 1872 ? Ss 18:01 0:03 /usr/sbin/sssd -D root 3367 0.0 0.1 137480 2556 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_dp -d 0 root 3374 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 18:01 0:00 [sssd_nss] root 3375 0.0 0.1 140484 3612 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_pam -d 0 root 3376 0.0 0.2 147616 5652 ? S 18:01 0:00 /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be -d 0 --domain LDAP root 6719 0.0 0.0 61176 720 tty1 R+ 19:22 0:00 grep sssd [root@host ~]# }}} milestone: SSSD 1.0 => SSSD 0.6.1 owner: somebody => simo priority: major => critical tests: 0 => 1
if you unplug the network and do 'id somenonexistentusername'
sssd_nss never returns anything. When it timeouts, sssd_nss is restarted for some reason. While the sssd_nss is waiting for something, the sssd process pinging nss responds ok.
(1254241223) [sssd[nss]] [sss_cmd_get_version] (5): Received client version [1]. (1254241223) [sssd[nss]] [sss_cmd_get_version] (5): Offered version [1]. (1254241223) [sssd[nss]] [nss_cmd_getpwnam] (4): Requesting info for [joohas546] from [<ALL>] (1254241223) [sssd[nss]] [nss_cmd_getpwnam] (4): Requesting info for [joohas546@LDAP] (1254241223) [sssd[nss]] [sss_dp_send_acct_req_create] (4): Sending request for [LDAP][1][core][name=joohas546] (1254241235) [sssd[nss]] [accept_fd_handler] (4): Client connected! (1254241235) [sssd[nss]] [sss_cmd_get_version] (5): Received client version [1]. (1254241235) [sssd[nss]] [sss_cmd_get_version] (5): Offered version [1]. (1254241235) [sssd[nss]] [nss_cmd_getpwnam] (4): Requesting info for [joohas5466545] from [<ALL>] (1254241235) [sssd[nss]] [nss_cmd_getpwnam] (4): Requesting info for [joohas5466545@LDAP] (1254241235) [sssd[nss]] [sss_dp_send_acct_req_create] (4): Sending request for [LDAP][1][core][name=joohas5466545] (1254241373) [sssd[nss]] [nss_cmd_getpwnam_dp_callback] (2): Unable to get information from Data Provider Error: 2, 62, Request timed out Will try to return what we have in cache (1254241373) [sssd[nss]] [nss_cmd_getpwnam_callback] (2): No matching domain found for [joohas546], fail! (1254241373) [sssd[nss]] [nss_cmd_getpwnam_callback] (2): No results for getpwnam call (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [server_setup] (3): CONFDB: /var/lib/sss/db/config.ldb (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [confdb_get_domain_internal] (1): No enumeration for [LDAP]! (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [sbus_init_connection] (5): Adding connection 1FD88410 (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [monitor_common_send_id] (4): Sending ID: (nss,1) (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [sbus_init_connection] (5): Adding connection 1FD89CE0 (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [dp_common_send_id] (4): Sending ID to DP: (2,1,NSS,) (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [sysdb_domain_init_internal] (5): DB File for LDAP: /var/lib/sss/db/cache_LDAP.ldb (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [ldb] (3): asq: Unable to register control with rootdse! (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [sss_process_init] (1): Responder Initialization complete (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [nss_process_init] (1): NSS Initialization complete (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [id_callback] (4): Got id ack and version (1) from DP (1254241374) [sssd[nss]] [id_callback] (4): Got id ack and version (1) from Monitor
steps to reproduce:
service sssd stop killall sssd killall sssd_be killall sssd_dp killall sssd_nss killall sssd_pam rm -f /var/lib/sss/db/* service sssd start # this works id somenonexistentusername #unplug the network #this does not anymore id somenonexistentusername2
The request goes to data provider but:
(1254242474) [sssd[dp]] [dp_get_account_info] (4): Got request for [LDAP][1][core][name=asoniaa] (1254242474) [sssd[dp]] [dp_send_acct_req] (4): Sending request for [1][core][name=asoniaa] (1254242624) [sssd[dp]] [sbus_dispatch] (3): Connection is not open for dispatching. (1254242625) [sssd[dp]] [sbus_server_init_new_connection] (5): Entering. (1254242625) [sssd[dp]] [sbus_server_init_new_connection] (5): Adding connection 0x53e9f40. (1254242625) [sssd[dp]] [sbus_init_connection] (5): Adding connection 53E9F40 (1254242625) [sssd[dp]] [sbus_server_init_new_connection] (5): Got a connection (1254242625) [sssd[dp]] [dp_client_init] (4): Set-up DP ID timeout [0x53ebcf0] (1254242625) [sssd[dp]] [client_registration] (4): Cancel DP ID timeout [0x53ebcf0] (1254242625) [sssd[dp]] [client_registration] (4): Added Frontend client [NSS]
It seems that sssd[be[LDAP]]] does not notice that we are offline
There some 10 minute timeouts in server/providers/ldap/sdap_async.c in ldap_search_ext functions
If you change them to something like few seconds 'id somenonexitentuser' command does not take all day right after unplugging the network.. The sssd_nss service still does a restart.
The patch that was merged to master works. Also it is now possible to set the timeout in configuration. ldap provider does a restart when timeout is reached, don't know if it should do that or not.
(1254471723) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [main] (1): Backend provider (LDAP) started!
But for me it looks like the bug is gone. I'll do another ticket if I find something more.
Fixed in 4e0314ecad0fb649bcc2d6384a84ae818ef7c972
fixedin: => 0.6.1 resolution: => fixed status: new => closed
tests: 1 => 0 testsupdated: 0 => 1
rhbz: => 0
Metadata Update from @villeys: - Issue assigned to simo - Issue set to the milestone: SSSD 0.6.1
SSSD is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in SSSD's github repository.
This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here: - https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/1247
If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue and click on subscribe button.
subscribe
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.