SSSD / sssd

#1796 do not use %{_lib} in specfile for distributions that do not have /lib anymore
Closed: Invalid Opened by jhrozek.

Closed: Invalid
Reopen Issue

After the contents of /lib was moved to /usr/lib, we shouldn't use macros that expand to /lib in our specfile. Currently /lib is a symlink to /usr/lib but there is no guarantee it will be this way forever.

Some automated QA tools (mainly in RHEL) are also discouraging the use of %{_lib}.

This would addressed in the platform specific spec file.

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.9.5
resolution: => wontfix
rhbz: => 0
status: new => closed

Metadata Update from @jhrozek:
- Issue set to the milestone: SSSD 1.9.5

SSSD is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests
will be accepted only in SSSD's github repository.

This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here:
- https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/2838

If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue
and click on subscribe button.

Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Metadata
None
None
None
None
Normal
defect
SSSD
1.9.4
0
0
0
0
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.