Description: With a very large database, gathering non-leaf IDs for creating the ancestorid index took an enormous amount of time. This test is to verify the fix for this problem.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49850
Author: sgouvern
Reviewed by: firstyear, spichugi
I don't see anything wrong with this test. @vashirov or @spichugi ?
small indentation issue
I think there is no reason to mention BZ number in the commit message. It is already mentioned in the pagure issue and as a pytest mark.
The rest looks good to me.
rebased onto bed349d7463150ba7febf62365f70cdcfd44e09f
rebased onto 9d5fe06e36c6bf7d2e6854b8f9c703a1779b81c2
Thanks @firstyear and @spichugi for your review. I fixed the indentation and commit message issues. @vashirov, I also changed the pytest marker from skipif to xfail, can you please review ?
LGTM! Ack
@spichugi Worth remembering that not everyone has commit rights, so when you ack sometimes you have to do the merge yourself :)
Pull-Request has been merged by firstyear
Thanks for the go and for the merge :)
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This pull request has been cloned to Github as issue and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4152
If you want to continue to work on the PR, please navigate to the github issue, download the patch from the attachments and file a new pull request.
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Pull-Request has been closed by spichugi
Description:
With a very large database, gathering non-leaf IDs for creating the ancestorid index took an enormous amount of time.
This test is to verify the fix for this problem.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49850
Author: sgouvern
Reviewed by: firstyear, spichugi