Users should be able to bind using certificate-based authentication. Also, dsconf replication monitor functionality should be extended accordingly.
dsconf replication monitor
What did you have in mind here? path to client certs in the .dsrc or similar? lib389 already supports cert auth so it should just need wiring in ...
Metadata Update from @firstyear: - Custom field origin adjusted to None - Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to None
Metadata Update from @mreynolds: - Issue set to the milestone: 1.4 backlog
Yeah, I think we should support both - .dsrc and direct CLI options for dsconf and dsidm. Also, we can check other parts like plugins, replication monitor (still in development), etc. Just to be sure that everywhere where we can use the certificate-based authentication - it is covered.
.dsrc
dsconf
dsidm
certificate-based authentication
dsrc and dsconf/dsidm already support the layering of options you desire. Look at src/lib389/lib389/cli_base/dsrc.py and how that inlines the options. When we take the clientcert option, we would have dsrc_to_ldap handle setting up the instance with the right auth.
For the replmonitor and cert auth, the best way would be to have repl monitor to use dsrc and the cli so that they could inherit the same code, and then it will just work :)
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/3646
If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue and click on subscribe button.
subscribe
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Metadata Update from @spichugi: - Issue close_status updated to: wontfix - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)