389-ds-base

#49576 ds-replcheck LDIF comparision fails when checking for conflicts
Closed: wontfix by mreynolds. Opened by mreynolds.

Closed: wontfix
Reopen Issue

Issue Description

Problem appears to be a case sensitive issue with "nsds5replconflict"

[root@localhost replication]# ds-replcheck -M /tmp/conflict.ldif -R /tmp/conflict2.ldif -c
Performing offline report...
Gathering all the DN's...
Gathering the database RUV's...
Comparing Master to Replica...
Comparing Replica to Master...
Preparing report...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/ds-replcheck", line 1122, in <module>
    main()
  File "/usr/bin/ds-replcheck", line 1112, in main
    do_offline_report(opts, OUTPUT_FILE)
  File "/usr/bin/ds-replcheck", line 535, in do_offline_report
    final_report += get_conflict_report(mconflicts, rconflicts, opts['conflicts'], format_conflicts=True)
  File "/usr/bin/ds-replcheck", line 773, in get_conflict_report
    m_conflicts.append({'dn': entry.dn, 'conflict': entry.data['nsds5replconflict'][0],
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ldap/cidict.py", line 27, in __getitem__
    return self.data[lower(key)]
KeyError: 'nsds5replconflict'

Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Custom field rhbz adjusted to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065

Issue linked to Bugzilla: Bug 1551065

Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Custom field component adjusted to None
- Custom field origin adjusted to None
- Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to None
- Custom field rhbz adjusted to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803 (was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065)
- Custom field type adjusted to None
- Custom field version adjusted to None

Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Custom field rhbz adjusted to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803 (was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803)

Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Custom field rhbz adjusted to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556841 (was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803)

Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Custom field rhbz adjusted to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556841, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556863 (was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556841)

Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Custom field rhbz adjusted to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556841, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556863, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556845 (was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551065, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556803, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556841, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556863)

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49700

Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to review (was: None)

Need to investigate test case around deleted attributes (;deleted vs ;deletedattribute" in LDIF comparision

commit 53e58cdbfb2a2672ac21cd9b6d59f8b345478324

21800c3c1..ed5d5970b 389-ds-base-1.3.8 -> 389-ds-base-1.3.8

660508dc6..19945c480 389-ds-base-1.3.7 -> 389-ds-base-1.3.7

Next, add support for attributeDeleted as discussed in PR

164a9591d..9e046a35a master -> master

ed5d5970b..be174a660 389-ds-base-1.3.8 -> 389-ds-base-1.3.8

19945c480..4b823fea1 389-ds-base-1.3.7 -> 389-ds-base-1.3.7

Metadata Update from @spichugi:
- Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to ack (was: review)

Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Issue close_status updated to: fixed
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests
will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.

This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here:
- https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/2635

If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue
and click on subscribe button.

Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.

Metadata Update from @spichugi:
- Issue close_status updated to: wontfix (was: fixed)
Metadata
None
None
None
None
ack
None
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.