Description of problem: The problem is that when replicating schema, we filter all the attributes except the "schema interesting attributes, that is to say: static char *schema_interesting_attr_types[] = { "dITStructureRules", "nameForms", "dITContentRules", "objectClasses", "attributeTypes", "matchingRules", "matchingRuleUse", "ldapSyntaxes", "nsschemacsn", NULL }; So, as modifytimestamp attribute is missing or not up to date, an application which checks schema changes using "modifytimestamp" attribute is not working as expected. Note: the priority is low. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1, Add new objectclass to schema in MMR: ldapmodify -p 1389 ... << EOF dn: cn=schema changetype: modify add: objectclasses objectclasses: ( mynewobj2-oid NAME 'mynewobj2' DESC '' SUP top STRUCTURAL X-ORIGIN 'object class' ) EOF 2. Do any other update to allow schema replication: ldapmodify -p 1389 ... dn: cn=user37,ou=people,o=redhat changetype: modify replace: sn sn: newone modifying entry "cn=user37,ou=people,o=redhat" 3. check schema repl has been done. And check modifytimestamp # ldapsearch -xLLL -p 1389 ... -b "cn=schema" objectclasses | grep mynewobj2-oid objectclasses: ( mynewobj2-oid NAME 'mynewobj2' DESC '' SUP top STRUCTURAL X-O # ldapsearch -xLLL -p 2389 ... -b "cn=schema" objectclasses | grep mynewobj2-oid objectclasses: ( mynewobj2-oid NAME 'mynewobj2' DESC '' SUP top STRUCTURAL X-O # # ldapsearch -xLLL -p 2389 -h localhost ... -b "cn=schema" modifytimestamp dn: cn=schema modifytimestamp: 20141216123736Z # ldapsearch -xLLL -p 1389 ... -b "cn=schema" modifytimestamp dn: cn=schema modifytimestamp: 20141216125329Z They are different. Actual results: modifytimestamp differs Expected results: modifytimestamp should match ?
Metadata Update from @nhosoi: - Issue set to the milestone: FUTURE
Metadata Update from @mreynolds: - Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to None - Issue close_status updated to: None - Issue tagged with: RFE, Schema
Metadata Update from @mreynolds: - Issue close_status updated to: wontfix - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/1340
If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue and click on subscribe button.
subscribe
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.